Contract Engineering Makes Good $en$e

Companies seek engineers to hire directly for a number of reasons.  But direct hire doesn’t have to be the only way to ensure that your manufacturing, project management, design, or other tasks are being addressed.  It is possible to have your projects completed and have good accountability without the overhead of another direct hire.

Contracting your engineering needs is certainly not new.  However, it is a viable option that you may not have considered for various reasons: the lack of a quality service provider, misconceptions that contracting is more expensive than doing the work in-house or the loss of control of a project.


Running the Numbers:

Engineer with 5-10 years of Experience:    $55,000 annual salary

Medical benefits, workers’ compensation,
401(k) retirement                                      $10,000 annual

                                                       Total: $65,000 annual   -OR- $31.25/hr

On any given week, this engineer may spend only 40% of their time working on pro-active projects:  cost reductions, quality improvement, etc.  The other 60% of their time is devoted to daily manufacturing or other tasks.


40% x 2080 hrs/year = 832 hours  832 hours x $31.25 = $26,000
 
If you could devote $26,000 each year to contract engineering, how much could you accomplish?

Scenario 1: Average Project Cost - $5,000

$26,000 / $5,000 = 5.2 –or- 5 projects completed each year

Scenario 2: Average Project Cost - $7,000

$26,000 / $7,000 = 3.7  -or- 3 projects completed each year

More Productivity

You would need to hire 2.5 engineers full-time, to yield a full year of time devoted to all of the pro-active projects you may have.   Why not consider a dual path?  When timing is short, use our contract services to help you achieve more with the resources that you have.

There are still only 24 hours in a day.  What will you accomplish with your day?